Bilateral CCL (cranial cruciate ligament) disease -- affecting both stifle joints -- is common in dogs.

Midvalley Animal Clinic confirms 30 to 40% of dogs with unilateral CCL rupture will eventually develop rupture of the contralateral CCL.

When both stifles are significantly affected, the decision between simultaneous bilateral TPLO and staged TPLO is one of the most important surgical planning discussions an owner will have.

Quick answer: Simultaneous bilateral TPLO operates on both stifles in one anesthetic event, offering a single recovery period and lower total cost. Staged TPLO operates on one leg at a time, reducing anesthetic risk. Simultaneous is preferred for healthy, large dogs with both stifles unstable. Staged is preferred for older, smaller, or compromised dogs.

Key takeaways

• 30 to 40% of dogs with unilateral CCL disease develop contralateral CCL rupture: bilateral TPLO may be planned proactively at presentation or urgently when the second CCL ruptures during recovery
• Simultaneous bilateral TPLO offers a single anesthetic event and shorter overall recovery: both knees heal together; total cost is lower than two staged surgeries
• Staged bilateral TPLO reduces surgical risk: each surgery is shorter; the dog has one functional leg during recovery; preferred for older or medically compromised dogs
• The critical challenge of simultaneous bilateral TPLO is recovery: with both rear legs restricted, owners must provide intensive physical support (slings) for the first 2 to 3 weeks
• PubMed research (176 bilateral TPLO cases) found no significant difference in overall complication rates between simultaneous and staged approaches in appropriately selected patients
• Large dogs with strong front limbs handle simultaneous TPLO better: smaller or weaker dogs benefit from the staged approach due to greater difficulty bearing weight on two compromised rear legs

Why bilateral CCL disease is common

CCL disease in dogs is degenerative, not purely traumatic.

The same factors that caused one CCL to rupture -- degenerative fiber changes, abnormal tibial plateau angle, breed predisposition, obesity, and mechanical overload -- are typically present in both stifles.

When a dog ruptures one CCL, it often shifts weight onto the contralateral leg, increasing the load on the already-compromised contralateral CCL. This accelerates degeneration and the timeline to rupture.

The clinical implication: even when only one stifle is symptomatic at presentation, the surgeon will typically assess both stifles.

Pre-operative radiographs of both stifles help determine whether the contralateral joint shows early instability, effusion, or an elevated TPA that warrants planning for bilateral surgery.

Simultaneous bilateral TPLO

Overview

Both stifles are operated on during a single general anesthetic event. The dog is positioned, the first TPLO is performed, the dog is repositioned, and the second TPLO is performed.

Total surgical time is approximately 3 to 4 hours.

Advantages

Single anesthetic event: the dog is exposed to general anesthesia once rather than twice. Each anesthetic event carries inherent risk; eliminating one event reduces cumulative anesthetic risk.

Faster total recovery: both legs heal simultaneously. Rather than 8 to 12 weeks of restriction for the first leg, then a second 8 to 12 week restriction for the second leg, the dog completes one restriction period covering both.

SustainableVet.org confirms: when both knees are corrected in a single surgery, the dog undergoes just one healing phase rather than two separate ones, returning to normal activity sooner.

Lower total cost: while the simultaneous surgery costs more than a single TPLO, it is less than two completely separate procedures with individual hospitalization, anesthesia fees, and post-operative care expenses.

SustainableVet.org confirms: simultaneous TPLO often reduces overall costs by avoiding duplicate anesthesia, hospitalization, and post-operative care fees.

Risks and challenges

Both rear legs are compromised simultaneously: the dog cannot transfer weight to a strong rear leg during the recovery period. All rear-limb support requires either front-limb loading (difficult for large breeds) or active owner assistance via sling.

Increased owner demand: SustainableVet.org confirms post-surgical care is more challenging because the dog cannot rely on a strong leg for support, requiring owners to provide intensive assistance.

Longer anesthetic duration: total surgical time of 3 to 4 hours for bilateral vs. 1.5 to 2 hours for unilateral increases the physiological burden of anesthesia and surgery.

Potentially higher complication rate in some populations: the PubMed 176-case study compared simultaneous and staged TPLO complications and found no significant overall difference, but the study population was highly selected.

Staged bilateral TPLO

Overview

The more significantly affected stifle is operated on first. After a full recovery (typically 8 to 12 weeks until bone healing is confirmed), the second stifle is operated on.

Advantages

Reduced surgical risk per event: each procedure is a standard unilateral TPLO, carrying the same risk profile as any single TPLO.

One functional rear leg during recovery: the dog can weight-bear on the unoperated leg immediately after the first surgery. This simplifies nursing care significantly and allows most dogs to stand and toilet independently.

Better option for older or compromised dogs: SustainableVet.org confirms older dogs or those with other health issues benefit from a staged approach to reduce surgical risk. Dogs with cardiac, renal, hepatic, or respiratory disease may not tolerate a 3 to 4 hour bilateral procedure safely.

Disadvantages

Two separate anesthetic events: two exposures to general anesthesia over a 3 to 6 month period.

Longer total recovery timeline: the dog may not reach full bilateral function for 6 to 9 months or longer from the date of the first surgery.

Higher total cost: two separate surgeries, two hospitalizations, two sets of post-operative medications and supplies.

Risk of contralateral rupture during the first recovery: the contralateral leg bears additional load during the first recovery period, accelerating degeneration. In some dogs, the second CCL ruptures acutely during the first recovery -- this forces an emergency decision about timing of the second surgery.

Which approach is right for a given dog?

Generally prefer simultaneous bilateral TPLO when:

• Both stifles are confirmed significantly unstable at presentation
• The dog is young, healthy, and large with strong front limb musculature
• The owner is able to provide intensive physical support during the bilateral recovery period
• The surgeon is experienced with bilateral TPLO technique
• Financial considerations favor the single-event approach

Generally prefer staged bilateral TPLO when:

• Only one stifle is currently significantly symptomatic (the second may be monitored and staged only if it progresses)
• The dog is older, small, or has significant concurrent health conditions
• The owner's ability to provide intensive bilateral recovery support is limited
• The anesthetic risk for a prolonged bilateral procedure is elevated

SustainableVet.org confirms: large dogs with strong front limbs may handle simultaneous TPLO better, while smaller or weaker dogs may benefit from a staged approach.

Bilateral TPLO recovery: what to expect

Simultaneous recovery

Weeks 1 to 2: the most demanding period. Both rear legs are compromised. The dog requires a sling for all mobility. Bathroom trips require active owner support.

Crate rest at all other times.

Weeks 2 to 6: gradual improvement. Both legs begin partial weight bearing. Sling use may reduce but is still needed for most dogs on stairs or uneven surfaces.

Weeks 6 to 12: radiographic assessment of both osteotomies. Activity increases based on healing of both legs.

Key equipment for bilateral TPLO recovery

• Lifting harness or rear-end sling (essential, not optional)
• Non-slip mats throughout the house
• Ramps for car access (no jumping in or out)
• Low dog beds at floor level

For the standard TPLO recovery timeline, see what to expect after TPLO surgery in dogs. For confinement advice, see how to confine your dog after TPLO surgery.

For post-op tips, see 10 essential TPLO recovery tips for pet owners. For the cost guide, see TPLO surgery cost in dogs.

Frequently asked questions

How will I know if my dog needs bilateral TPLO?

Your vet will assess both stifles during the physical examination.

Signs that the contralateral stifle is also affected include drawer sign or tibial thrust on the second side, joint effusion on radiographs, or intermittent lameness on both rear legs.

Both stifles are typically radiographed at the pre-operative planning visit.

Can the second CCL rupture while my dog is recovering from the first TPLO?

Yes. This is one of the main risks of staged TPLO. The unoperated leg bears more weight during recovery, accelerating degeneration.

If the second CCL ruptures acutely, the dog becomes bilateral suddenly and the timing of the second surgery must be reassessed with your vet.

Is bilateral TPLO safe for large breeds?

Yes, when appropriately selected. Large dogs with good front limb strength typically handle the bilateral recovery better than small dogs.

The challenge is the nursing care requirement, which is significant regardless of size. Ensure you have the physical ability to support a large dog in a sling before committing to simultaneous surgery.

My dog needs bilateral TPLO but I can only afford one surgery now. What should I do?

This is a common situation. Staged TPLO is appropriate and legitimate. Operate on the more severely affected stifle first and monitor the second closely.

Discuss weight management and controlled activity to reduce load on the second stifle during the first recovery. Plan financially for the second surgery.

Do both TPLO plates stay in permanently?

Yes, unless a complication (infection, implant failure) necessitates removal.

If both plates require removal, it can be done as a single procedure or staged, depending on the reason for removal and the healing status of each osteotomy.

Resources

• SustainableVet. Bilateral TPLO Surgery. sustainablevet.org
• PubMed. Comparison of Intra- and Postoperative Complications Between Bilateral Simultaneous and Staged TPLO. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
• Midvalley Animal Clinic. Pre-Op Instructions for TPLO. midvalleyanimalclinic.com
• ACVS. Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease. acvs.org

Before performing TPLO surgery, the veterinary surgeon selects the appropriate bone plate from a range of sizes specific to the implant system being used.

The plate size chart is the reference tool that guides this selection.

Choosing the correct plate is as important as the surgical technique itself an undersized plate risks mechanical failure, and an oversized plate may not fit the tibial anatomy correctly.

Quick answer: The TPLO plate size chart matches body weight and tibial bone dimensions to the appropriate implant. Arthrex plates range from 2.0 mm to 4.5 mm; Synthes covers a similar range. Tibial width is measured on preoperative radiographs and used alongside body weight to select the plate and screw configuration.

Key takeaways

• The plate size chart is a preoperative planning tool that matches body weight and bone dimensions to the appropriate implant
• Arthrex offers TPLO plates from 2.0 mm to 4.5 mm: the small sizes are purpose-designed for small breed anatomy, not scaled-down large plates
• Tibial width is measured on preoperative radiographs: a primary determinant of plate selection alongside body weight
• Plate selection is system-specific: Arthrex plates require Arthrex instruments and screws; Synthes requires Synthes-specific tools
• The plate is single-use sterile: a new plate must be available if a different size is needed intraoperatively
• Correct plate selection directly affects outcomes: undersized plates risk fatigue fracture; oversized plates cause soft tissue irritation

What the plate size chart does

The TPLO plate size chart is a lookup reference similar in function to the rotation chart and weight chart that are part of the Arthrex and Synthes TPLO planning systems.

It takes known inputs (primarily body weight and tibial dimensions measured on radiographs) and outputs the recommended plate size from the manufacturer's product range.

SustainableVet.org explains: a TPLO plate size chart is a reference guide used by veterinary surgeons to select the appropriate implant size for stabilizing the tibia after TPLO surgery.

Plates come in various lengths and hole numbers to fit different dog breeds and bone sizes.

The chart removes the guesswork from a decision that significantly affects the mechanical performance of the repair.

A plate that is correctly sized distributes load evenly across all screw holes and lies flush against the cortical bone surface, minimizing stress risers and soft tissue irritation.

Key variables in plate size selection

Body weight

Body weight is the primary initial filter. Heavier dogs generate higher joint forces and require larger, stiffer plates to withstand the loads applied during weight-bearing and normal activity.

General size categories used across Arthrex and Synthes product lines:

• Small breed (under 10 to 15 kg): 2.0 mm or 2.4 mm plates
• Medium breed (15 to 30 kg): 3.5 mm plates
• Large breed (30 to 50 kg): 3.5 mm or 4.5 mm plates
• Giant breed (over 50 kg): 4.5 mm plates; locking systems particularly important

These ranges are approximate and surgeon-dependent. The specific manufacturer chart values take precedence over general categories.

Tibial width and bone dimensions

The plate must span the osteotomy site with at least 2 screws proximal and 2 screws distal to the cut for adequate fixation.

The tibial width at the planned osteotomy level measured in millimeters on a mediolateral radiograph determines which plate length and screw configuration provides sufficient purchase without overhanging the bone margins.

Number of screw holes

Plates are available with different numbers of holes (typically 4, 5, or 6 holes for standard sizes).

More holes provide more screw fixation points, which is important in larger dogs or those expected to be highly active during recovery.

SustainableVet.org notes: plates come in various lengths and hole numbers to fit different dog breeds and bone sizes, allowing surgeons to select the configuration that best matches each individual patient's anatomy.

Arthrex TPLO plate system

Arthrex produces the most widely used TPLO locking plate system in the United States. The Arthrex TPLO Locking Plate System is designed with specific anatomical features to facilitate consistent plate placement.

From Arthrex Vet Systems documentation: the 2.0 mm and 2.4 mm TPLO locking plates are not simply shrunken versions of larger TPLO plates.

The smaller plates were purpose-designed for small breed bone anatomy.

Small dogs have proportionally different tibial geometry, and scaling down a large plate does not optimize screw angle or load distribution.

Arthrex's 4.5 mm plate incorporates a caudal tilt designed for improved screw purchase in the proximal tibial segment, with a proximal screw trajectory directed to avoid the osteotomy line.

This is an important design feature: screws that inadvertently cross the osteotomy reduce fixation quality and risk creating a stress concentration at the cut.

The Arthrex system includes an InternalBrace ligament augmentation option for dogs with severe stifle instability. This knotless lateral stabilization technique is not part of standard TPLO.

For the Arthrex plate overview, see Arthrex TPLO plate overview and use. For the Synthes plate overview, see Synthes TPLO plate overview and use.

How the plate size chart integrates with other planning tools

The plate size chart is used in concert with two other charts in the preoperative planning sequence:

Rotation chart: determines how many degrees the tibial segment must be rotated to achieve the target postoperative TPA of approximately 5 degrees. This is completed using the preoperative TPA measurement from radiographs.

Weight chart: guides post-operative weight-bearing expectations during rehabilitation.

All three charts together form the complete preoperative planning and post-operative monitoring framework. For the rotation chart, see Arthrex TPLO rotation chart explained.

For the weight chart, see Arthrex TPLO weight chart explained.

Why correct plate size matters

Mechanical adequacy: the plate must be strong enough to withstand the bending forces applied across the osteotomy during recovery typically equivalent to body weight or more during brief dynamic loading events (jumping down from a bed despite restrictions). An undersized plate risks fatigue fracture if the osteotomy takes longer to heal than expected.

Biological fit: the plate must lie flush against the bone surface. A plate that sits proud causes soft tissue irritation and can lead to the implant-associated pain and lameness that eventually requires plate removal.

Screw purchase quality: screws that are too short for the bone depth, or too long and penetrating the far cortex inappropriately, compromise fixation quality. Plate size selection is linked to the specific screw lengths that are compatible with each plate variant.

Frequently asked questions

Can the surgeon change the plate size during surgery?

Yes. If the preoperatively planned plate size does not fit correctly once the osteotomy is made and the bone is positioned, the surgeon may open a different plate size.

This is why surgical teams keep a range of plate sizes available in the sterile field or immediately accessible.

The plate is a single-use sterile item it cannot be resterilized if opened and unused.

Are Arthrex and Synthes plates interchangeable?

No. Each manufacturer's plates require that manufacturer's specific screws, instruments, and jigs.

Using Synthes screws in an Arthrex plate (or vice versa) risks stripped screw heads, incorrect screw purchase geometry, and compromised fixation. The systems are entirely separate.

How does the surgeon know which plate to order before surgery?

The surgeon measures the tibial width and records body weight at the preoperative planning appointment.

Based on these measurements and the manufacturer's size chart, a specific plate and screw set is ordered or identified from the implant inventory before surgery.

Is a larger plate always better for a big dog?

Not necessarily.

The plate must fit the tibial anatomy. A plate longer than the available cortical surface overhangs the bone, creating soft tissue irritation and stress concentration at the plate ends.

The goal is the smallest plate that provides adequate mechanical fixation for the dog's body weight and expected activity level.

What happens if the wrong plate size is used?

An undersized plate risks fatigue fracture under repetitive loading. An oversized plate may not conform to the bone surface, reducing screw fixation quality and potentially causing soft tissue irritation.

Plate failure or malposition requiring revision is a recognized complication of poor implant selection.

Resources

• Arthrex Vet Systems. TPLO Locking Plate System. arthrexvetsystems.com
• Arthrex Vet Systems. 4.5 mm TPLO Plates and Screws. arthrexvetsystems.com
• PMC. Influence of Fixation Systems on Complications After TPLO in Dogs Greater Than 45 kg. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
• VCA Animal Hospitals. Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy (TPLO) in Dogs. vcahospitals.com

A seroma is one of the most common soft tissue complications after TPLO surgery in dogs.

Finding a soft lump under the skin near the surgical site is alarming, but in most cases it is a benign finding that resolves with strict rest and time.

Understanding the difference between a seroma and a more serious complication helps you respond appropriately.

Quick answer: A seroma is clear serum fluid under the TPLO incision, not an infection. Small seromas resolve in 1 to 3 weeks with rest; larger ones need sterile aspiration. Call your vet if the swelling is hot, fast-growing, or producing discharge.

Key takeaways

• A seroma is clear serum fluid under the skin — not an infection; a benign accumulation from disrupted blood and lymphatic vessels
• Excessive activity is the leading preventable cause: unnecessary movement produces more fluid and enlarges the seroma
• Small seromas resolve with strict rest in 1 to 3 weeks: the lymphatic system reabsorbs the fluid without intervention
• Large seromas may need needle aspiration: a sterile outpatient procedure by your vet; never drain at home
• Warm packs twice daily help reabsorption: 10 minutes of warmth twice daily is recommended for established seromas
• A seroma that becomes warm, red, painful, or produces discharge needs immediate vet attention it may have become infected

What is a seroma?

Vetinfo explains that a seroma is a swelling resulting from the accumulation of fluid under the skin.

It is made of serous fluid (blood plasma without most of the cells), so it is usually watery with a slight pink tinge rather than dark blood or cloudy infected fluid.

After TPLO surgery, the osteotomy site and surrounding soft tissues leave behind a space between tissue layers called dead space where fluid from disrupted capillaries and lymphatics can collect.

The fluid pools there before the body's healing processes close the space.

Seromas feel soft, fluctuant (squishy), and move under finger pressure. They are usually not painful when small and are not warm to the touch.

These features distinguish them from infections, which are typically warm, firm, painful, and may produce purulent discharge.

What causes seromas after TPLO?

Excessive activity

This is the most important and most preventable cause. Vetinfo confirms that seromas occur when a dog is active immediately after surgery instead of remaining inactive during recovery.

Every unnecessary step disrupts the tissue planes that need to approximate and seal, producing more fluid.

The surgeon Dr.

Matt confirms on JustAnswer that the best way to reduce seromas is to restrict activity as much as possible at least 8 weeks of restricted activity after TPLO is recommended.

Dead space at the surgical site

TPLO surgery involves significant soft tissue dissection around the proximal tibia. Closing this space with sutures reduces but does not eliminate dead space.

Any gap between tissue layers fills with fluid before normal healing closes it.

Surgical drainage

In some cases, surgical drains are placed during the procedure to allow fluid to escape rather than collect.

Not all surgeons routinely place drains some reserve them for dogs considered at higher risk of seroma formation.

Patient factors

Larger dogs produce more dead space and more fluid. Dogs with more subcutaneous fat are at higher risk.

Dogs that are particularly active during recovery despite attempts at confinement are most likely to develop significant seromas.

Recognizing a seroma

Classic signs:

• Soft, squishy swelling directly under or near the incision site
• The swelling moves under pressure it feels like a water balloon
• Normal skin color over the swelling (not red or purple)
• Not painful when gentle pressure is applied
• Not warm to the touch
• No discharge from the skin over the swelling

When to suspect infection instead:

• The swelling is warm, red, or firm rather than soft
• A draining tract or discharge appears from the skin
• The dog shows increased pain, fever, lethargy, or loss of appetite
• The swelling is growing rapidly

Treatment

Small seromas: observation and rest

Cuteness notes that most often the body absorbs the fluid and the swelling diminishes. For small seromas (typically under 3 cm), the approach is:

• Enforce strict activity restriction no running, jumping, or free roaming
• Cold compresses in the first few days (reduces new fluid production)
• Warm compresses from days 5 onward 10 minutes, twice daily to promote fluid reabsorption
• Monitor size and character daily

Large or persistent seromas: needle aspiration

Large seromas that are uncomfortable or not responding to rest may be drained by your veterinarian using a sterile needle and syringe. This is a simple outpatient procedure.

Cuteness confirms that veterinarians may drain or aspirate the seroma to make the dog more comfortable.

Aspiration provides relief but does not address the underlying dead space. The seroma may refill sometimes multiple aspirations are required. After aspiration, continued strict rest is essential.

Compression bandaging

A gentle compression bandage applied by your vet reduces dead space and discourages fluid refilling after aspiration.

Improper bandaging can cause pressure sores or circulatory compromise, so bandages must be applied and monitored by a veterinarian.

Surgical drain placement

If a seroma repeatedly refills after aspiration, a closed suction drain may be placed to allow ongoing drainage until the dead space closes.

This is uncommon but is an option for persistent or large seromas.

For the full fluid buildup guide covering all types of post-TPLO fluid accumulation, see fluid buildup after TPLO surgery in dogs.

For incision complications including infection, see TPLO incision infection symptoms and prevention. For the full complications reference, see 15 common complications after TPLO surgery in dogs.

For the incision redness guide to distinguish seroma from infection, see redness after TPLO surgery in dogs: causes and care.

Frequently asked questions

Can a seroma go away on its own?

Yes in the majority of cases, small seromas resolve without intervention as the body reabsorbs the fluid over 1 to 3 weeks.

Strict activity restriction is essential; without it, the seroma will continue to refill as fast as it drains.

Do not assume a seroma will resolve if the dog is not being properly confined.

Should I drain the seroma myself at home?

Never. Home drainage risks introducing bacteria into a sterile fluid collection, converting a benign seroma into an infected abscess. Only a veterinarian should aspirate a seroma under sterile conditions.

If you believe the seroma needs draining, contact your vet.

My dog's seroma looks like it ruptured through the skin. What do I do?

Spontaneous seroma rupture does occasionally occur. The fluid drains through the skin, leaving a small wound.

Contact your vet immediately for guidance the wound will need to be kept clean and monitored for infection. A veterinarian Dr.

Matt reports this occurrence on JustAnswer, confirming prompt vet contact is appropriate.

How long does a seroma last after TPLO?

Small seromas typically resolve in 1 to 3 weeks with strict activity restriction. Larger ones may take 4 to 6 weeks and may require aspiration.

If a seroma persists beyond 4 weeks without improvement, a veterinary recheck is warranted.

Is a seroma the same as an infection?

No. A seroma is sterile fluid no bacteria. An infection involves bacterial colonization and produces different characteristics: warmth, redness, purulent discharge, systemic illness signs.

Bacterial culture distinguishes them definitively if clinical assessment is uncertain.

Resources

• Vetinfo. Seroma After-Surgery Care for Dogs. vetinfo.com
• Cuteness. What Are the Treatments for Seroma Formation in Dogs? cuteness.com
• VCA Animal Hospitals. Seroma in Dogs. vcahospitals.com
• TPLO Info. Recovery FAQs. tploinfo.com

TPLO is the most commonly performed surgery for CCL rupture in dogs and the most commonly misunderstood.

Misconceptions about TPLO cause unnecessary hesitation, lead some owners to choose inferior alternatives, and create unrealistic expectations about recovery.

This guide addresses the 10 most common myths directly -- with evidence-based clarification for each.

Quick answer: The most persistent TPLO myths: that dogs can manage without surgery, that TPLO is only for large breeds, that recovery takes a few weeks, that the plate must be removed after healing, and that TPLO prevents arthritis. All are false. TPLO has a 90 to 95% success rate.

Key takeaways

• Myth: "My dog can heal without surgery": dog knee anatomy differs fundamentally from human; without surgery, severe OA, meniscal tearing, and chronic lameness are expected in most dogs over 15 kg
• Myth: "TPLO is only for large dogs": SustainableVet.org confirms TPLO is just as effective for small and toy breeds; the biomechanical correction is appropriate regardless of size
• Myth: "Recovery only takes a few weeks": bone healing takes 8 to 12 weeks; full muscle recovery takes 4 to 6 months; 8 to 12 weeks is the minimum restriction period
• Myth: "The plate needs to be removed after healing": the TPLO plate is designed to be permanent; removal is only performed when complications arise
• Myth: "TPLO prevents arthritis": all CCL-affected stifles develop progressive OA regardless of surgical technique; TPLO reduces OA progression but does not prevent it
• Myth: "Dogs are in severe pain after TPLO": SustainableVet.org confirms this is a misconception; modern multi-modal pain management controls post-surgical pain effectively

Myth 1: "My dog can heal without surgery"

The truth: dogs and humans have fundamentally different knee anatomy. In humans, the flat tibial plateau and strong surrounding musculature allow some CCL tears to be managed conservatively with physical therapy and bracing. In dogs, the tibial plateau slopes steeply downward, generating a cranial shear force that the absent CCL cannot resist. Without surgical correction of this force, the joint remains mechanically unstable with every weight-bearing step.

TPLO Info confirms: dogs and humans respond very differently to CCL tears. Without surgery, severe OA can develop, meniscal tearing can occur, and other side effects may be present.

Conservative management (strict rest, weight management, joint supplements, physical therapy) can provide temporary improvement, particularly in small dogs and partial tears.

For most dogs over 15 kg with complete CCL rupture, conservative management does not restore normal joint stability, and progressive lameness, OA, and joint deterioration are the expected outcome.

Who can be managed conservatively?

• Very small dogs (under 10 to 15 kg) with partial tears and low activity levels
• Dogs with significant comorbidities where anesthetic risk outweighs surgical benefit
• Owners who decline surgery after being fully informed of expected outcomes

For all other dogs -- medium and large breeds, young dogs, active dogs, complete ruptures -- surgery produces substantially better outcomes than conservative management.

Myth 2: "TPLO is only for large dogs"

The truth: TPLO was originally developed for large and giant breeds because they were the most severely affected by CCL disease and the most poorly served by lateral suture stabilization. But TPLO corrects the underlying biomechanical problem (excessive tibial plateau angle) in any dog, regardless of size.

SustainableVet.org confirms: TPLO was initially developed for large dogs due to biomechanical challenges, but has been found just as effective for small and toy breeds.

For small dogs, both TPLO and lateral suture stabilization can achieve good outcomes.

The decision for a small dog should be based on the dog's TPA, activity level, and individual assessment -- not a blanket assumption that TPLO is unnecessary.

Myth 3: "TPLO recovery only takes a few weeks"

The truth: bone healing takes 8 to 12 weeks. This is the period of activity restriction. But bone healing and functional recovery are not the same thing. Full muscle rebuilding and joint function restoration takes 4 to 6 months from surgery.

Canada Vet Express confirms: recovery is gradual; most dogs begin walking within a few days and return to normal activity within 3 to 4 months with proper care.

The 8 to 12 week bone healing timeline means:

• Activity restrictions are in place for 8 to 12 weeks minimum
• Radiographic confirmation of healing is required before restrictions are lifted
• Progressive return to full activity follows the radiographic clearance

After restrictions are lifted, the operated leg continues to rebuild strength and coordination for months. For sport dogs and working dogs, the return-to-sport protocol extends to 7 to 9 months from surgery.

Myth 4: "The TPLO plate needs to be removed after the bone heals"

The truth: the plate is designed to remain in place permanently. It does not need to be removed when the osteotomy heals. Routine plate removal is not standard practice in veterinary orthopedics.

SustainableVet.org confirms: these implants are meant to stay in place permanently, but in rare cases they can cause problems; removal is only performed when complications arise.

When plate removal is performed:

• Deep implant-associated infection requiring source removal
• Implant failure (breakage, loosening causing instability)
• Persistent implant irritation producing clinical lameness specifically attributable to the plate

In the vast majority of dogs, the plate is never removed. It remains in place for life with no adverse effects.

Myth 5: "TPLO prevents arthritis"

The truth: TPLO reduces and slows arthritis progression. It does not prevent it. All CCL-affected stifles develop progressive OA regardless of surgical technique or outcome.

SustainableVet.org confirms: mild arthritis is expected even in successful cases.

Published long-term data (TPLO Info, citing long-term retrospective studies) confirms moderate but significant OA progression in all TPLO cohorts with follow-up extending to 6.8 years.

TPLO produces substantially less OA progression than TTA or lateral suture stabilization, but OA progression is universal.

The appropriate expectation: TPLO minimizes OA development and clinical impact. Long-term management (weight management, exercise modification, joint supplements, and periodic NSAID use for flares) is required in all TPLO dogs.

Myth 6: "Dogs are in severe pain after TPLO"

The truth: modern veterinary anesthesia and pain management protocols produce well-controlled post-operative pain in TPLO dogs. Dogs typically begin bearing some weight within 24 to 48 hours. Pain that is not controlled is a clinical problem requiring medication adjustment -- not an expected feature of TPLO recovery.

SustainableVet.org confirms: it is a misconception that dogs experience severe pain after TPLO surgery; modern multi-modal pain management controls post-surgical pain effectively.

Post-operative pain management typically includes: NSAIDs (carprofen, meloxicam), gabapentin, opioids during hospitalization, local anesthetic nerve blocks at surgery.

Dogs in adequate pain control rest comfortably, bear some weight within days, and show appetite by day 3.

Uncontrolled post-operative pain (dog cannot settle, crying, refuses all weight bearing beyond day 3) indicates a need for pain medication adjustment -- contact your vet rather than accepting it as inevitable.

Myth 7: "TPLO is too risky for most dogs"

The truth: TPLO has a 90 to 95% success rate. The complication rate across all studies is 10 to 34%, but the vast majority of complications are minor (superficial infection, seroma, mild swelling). Serious complications requiring revision surgery occur in fewer than 10% of cases.

Dispomed confirms: overall complication rates are 14 to 34%, but a second surgery is required in less than 10% of cases.

No surgery is without risk.

But for a dog with a torn CCL, the risk of TPLO is substantially lower than the certainty of progressive joint deterioration, pain, and reduced quality of life without surgical treatment.

Myth 8: "TPLO is only for show dogs or working dogs"

The truth: TPLO is appropriate for any dog with CCL rupture that will benefit from restored joint stability -- including middle-aged household pets with no competitive goals.

SustainableVet.org confirms: some pet owners mistakenly believe that TPLO surgery is only for show dogs or high-performance athletes; this is not true; TPLO benefits any dog with CCL disease.

The goal of TPLO is freedom from joint pain and restored ability to perform normal daily activities -- walking, playing, using stairs, sitting and rising comfortably.

These are benefits for every dog, not just sport dogs.

Myth 9: "All dogs with CCL tears need TPLO immediately"

The truth: TPLO is not always an emergency. The timing of surgery should be guided by the veterinary assessment. Partial tears in small dogs may be monitored with conservative management. Dogs with significant concurrent illness may benefit from medical optimization before surgery. The appropriate goal is surgical timing that optimizes anesthetic risk and surgical conditions, not surgical urgency at any cost.

SustainableVet.org confirms: while TPLO surgery is the best treatment for CCL tears, it isn't necessary for every case; for mild or partial tears in less active dogs, alternatives can be effective.

However, in dogs with complete rupture, particularly larger breeds, delay generally produces worse outcomes as OA progresses and the meniscus is exposed to ongoing mechanical insult from the unstable joint.

Myth 10: "If TPLO fails, the dog will never recover"

The truth: most TPLO complications are treatable. Superficial infections resolve with antibiotics. Late meniscal tears are treated with partial meniscectomy. Implant failures can be revised. Osteomyelitis, the most challenging complication, requires prolonged treatment but is often successfully managed.

SustainableVet.org confirms: revision TPLO surgery can be performed if the initial procedure fails; this may involve removing or replacing implants, repositioning the tibial cut, or addressing infections.

The critical factor in outcome from a complication is early detection and prompt treatment. Most complications that are identified and treated early resolve without long-term sequelae.

For the full TPLO overview, see what is TPLO surgery in dogs?. For the success rate data, see TPLO failure rate in dogs. For recovery, see what to expect after TPLO surgery.

For alternatives, see alternatives to TPLO surgery for dogs.

Frequently asked questions

Is TPLO actually the best treatment for CCL rupture?

For most dogs over 15 to 20 kg, TPLO is the most evidence-supported surgical option, producing the highest rates of long-term function and owner satisfaction in the published literature.

For small dogs, lateral suture stabilization achieves comparable results at lower cost. The choice depends on the individual dog's size, activity level, TPA, and health status.

Can I wait and see how my dog does without surgery?

You can choose conservative management.

The expected outcome in most dogs over 15 kg with complete CCL rupture who do not have surgery is progressive lameness, rapidly advancing OA, ongoing meniscal damage, and reduced quality of life.

Early surgical intervention consistently produces better long-term outcomes than delayed or non-surgical management.

Is the recovery really as strict as described?

Yes. The restriction protocol exists because the plate holds the osteotomy until new bone consolidates -- a process that takes 8 to 12 weeks regardless of how well the dog appears.

A single running or jumping episode before healing is confirmed can displace the plate and require revision surgery.

Will my dog be the same dog after TPLO?

Most owners report their dog is effectively the same dog -- or better than before the CCL rupture -- within 6 to 12 months of surgery.

The 90 to 95% success rate reflects a high proportion of dogs returning to their previous activity level.

Some dogs develop mild age-related stiffness years later as OA progresses, but this is manageable with appropriate care.

Does TPLO cure the CCL problem permanently?

TPLO permanently corrects the biomechanical cause of CCL-related instability in the operated stifle. It does not repair or replace the CCL -- it makes the CCL unnecessary.

It does not prevent CCL disease in the contralateral stifle.

Resources

• SustainableVet. Common Myths About TPLO Surgery Explained. sustainablevet.org
• TPLO Info. 5 Misconceptions About TPLO Surgery. tploinfo.com
• Dispomed. TPLO Surgery in Dogs: Success Rates and Alternatives. dispomed.com
• ACVS. Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease. acvs.org

TPLO has a high overall success rate, but complications do occur. The published overall complication rate ranges from 10 to 34%, with most complications being minor and manageable.

Knowing what to watch for -- and when a sign requires a same-day call vs. a mention at the next scheduled appointment -- allows owners to respond appropriately.

Quick answer: The 15 most common post-TPLO complications: surgical site infection, seroma, implant loosening or failure, osteomyelitis, late meniscal tear, tibial tuberosity fracture, delayed bone healing, persistent lameness, non-union, intra-articular screw placement, nerve damage, patellar tendon thickening, patellar luxation, progressive osteoarthritis, and contralateral CCL rupture. Most are minor and manageable.

Key takeaways

• The overall complication rate is 10 to 34%: most complications are minor (swelling, mild infection); serious complications such as implant failure or osteomyelitis are less common
• SSI is the most frequent single complication: reported in 2.9% to 17.3% of TPLO procedures; most are superficial and treatable with antibiotics if caught early
• Late meniscal tear occurs in 1.8% to 10.5% of cases where the meniscus was normal at surgery; it presents as sudden lameness return with meniscal click
• Tibial tuberosity fracture is reported in 1 to 9% of TPLO cases: incorrect positioning and oversized saw blades are the main risk factors
• Implant-associated infection occurred in 3.4% and osteomyelitis in 0.6% across numerous studies; osteomyelitis requires strong antibiotics for 4 to 6 months and sometimes plate removal
• Contralateral CCL rupture is a significant long-term risk: 30 to 40% of dogs develop rupture of the opposite CCL; owners should monitor the opposite stifle

Early complications (weeks 0 to 8)

1. Surgical site infection (SSI)

The most common complication. SSI ranges from superficial incisional infection (treatable with oral antibiotics and wound care) to deep implant-associated infection requiring plate removal.

Signs: redness spreading beyond the incision, warmth, swelling, cloudy or malodorous discharge.

Incidence: 2.9% to 17.3% per published literature; the PMC 769-TPLO study (769 procedures) found 8.5%.

Management: culture-directed antibiotics for superficial infections; surgical debridement and sometimes plate removal for deep implant infections.

2. Seroma

A localized collection of clear serous fluid under the skin near the incision, typically appearing 1 to 3 weeks post-surgery.

Signs: soft, fluctuant swelling at or near the incision; no warmth or redness; clear fluid if aspirated.

Incidence: common; most resolve without treatment.

Management: monitoring; aspiration if large or causing discomfort; bandaging in some cases.

3. Acute lameness from overactivity

The dog is over-active during the restriction period and bears too much load on the plate before the osteotomy heals.

Signs: sudden worsening of lameness after a period of improvement; may indicate implant stress or early failure.

Management: strict crate rest; radiographic assessment to rule out implant displacement.

4. Wound dehiscence

The incision edges separate before fully healing. More common in dogs that lick the incision despite an e-collar that fits incorrectly.

Signs: open wound edges, sometimes with tissue visible.

Management: cleaning and re-closure in most cases; e-collar compliance review.

Mid-term complications (weeks 4 to 16)

5. Delayed bone healing

The osteotomy is not showing expected consolidation on radiographs at the 6 to 8 week checkpoint.

Signs: radiographic evidence of widening osteotomy gap or absence of callus formation; may or may not produce clinical signs.

Risk factors: infection, excessive activity, poor bone quality (older dogs, large breeds), NSAIDs at high doses for extended periods.

Management: extended activity restriction; investigate for underlying infection; nutritional support.

6. Tibial tuberosity fracture

A fracture of the tibial tuberosity (the prominence where the patellar tendon attaches) caused by the osteotomy saw blade coming too close to this structure.

Incidence: 1 to 9% per Laguna Woods Vets; higher in dogs with high TPA, high body weight, and large TPA change.

Signs: acute severe lameness; radiographic evidence of fracture.

Management: surgical repair or conservative management depending on displacement.

7. Late meniscal tear

A meniscal tear occurring after TPLO in a meniscus that appeared normal at surgery. See the dedicated meniscal tear article for full detail.

Incidence: 1.8% to 10.5% of cases with normal meniscus at TPLO (Dog Discoveries).

Signs: sudden lameness regression; meniscal click on movement; pain on stifle manipulation.

Management: partial meniscectomy.

8. Implant loosening or failure

The plate or screws shift, bend, or break -- typically from premature overactivity before the osteotomy heals.

Signs: sudden severe lameness; pain at plate site; radiographic evidence of screw loosening, plate migration, or osteotomy displacement.

Management: revision surgery in most cases of significant displacement.

Long-term complications (months 3 and beyond)

9. Osteomyelitis

Bone infection extending from a superficial SSI or introduced via hematogenous seeding. Difficult to treat.

Incidence: 0.6% per Dog Discoveries citing multiple studies.

Signs: persistent lameness; draining tract; radiographic bone destruction, periosteal reaction, or sequestrum.

Management: Laguna Woods Vets confirms osteomyelitis requires strong antibiotics for 4 to 6 months; a wound culture aids antibiotic selection; plate removal is often required.

10. Non-union

The osteotomy fails to heal, resulting in permanent instability at the cut site.

Risk factors: infection, inadequate fixation, excessive motion, poor blood supply.

Signs: persistent lameness; radiographic evidence of osteotomy gap persisting beyond 16 weeks with no bridging callus.

Management: revision surgery, bone grafting, and often implant revision.

11. Intra-articular screw placement

A screw tip violates the joint space, causing joint damage and persistent pain. Best identified on the postoperative radiograph.

Signs: ongoing lameness; pain on stifle range of motion; radiographic evidence of screw in joint space.

Management: removal of the offending screw.

12. Persistent lameness without identifiable cause

Some dogs have persistent mild lameness despite uncomplicated bone healing and no identifiable complication. This may reflect residual arthritis progression, muscle atrophy, or subclinical meniscal issues.

Management: rehabilitation, joint supplements, and management of secondary osteoarthritis.

13. Patellar tendon thickening

Fibrous thickening of the patellar tendon develops in some TPLO dogs over time. This is typically not clinically significant.

Signs: palpable thickening of the patellar tendon on examination; usually incidental finding.

Management: generally none required; physiotherapy in some cases.

14. Patellar luxation

Medial patellar luxation can develop or worsen after TPLO, particularly if the plate is contoured in a way that affects patellar tracking.

Signs: intermittent lameness, popping of the patella medially on examination.

Management: surgical correction (trochleoplasty and tibial crest transposition) in symptomatic cases.

15. Progressive osteoarthritis

All dogs with CCL disease develop some arthritis progression regardless of surgical technique. TPLO slows but does not stop this process.

Signs: gradual stiffness, lameness that is worse after rest, reduced activity tolerance.

Management: joint supplements (omega-3 fatty acids, glucosamine), weight management, NSAIDs for flares, hydrotherapy.

Contralateral CCL rupture: a special consideration

Contralateral CCL rupture is not a complication of TPLO but deserves mention.

Midvalley Animal Clinic confirms it is very common (30 to 40% of patients) for both knees to develop this ligament injury.

Owners of dogs that have had unilateral TPLO should monitor the opposite stifle for early signs.

For the infection guide, see TPLO plate infection signs and treatment. For the meniscal tear guide, see dog meniscus tear after TPLO surgery.

For the failure rate overview, see TPLO failure rate in dogs. For the implant failure signs, see TPLO implant failure signs and causes.

Frequently asked questions

What is the most common serious complication after TPLO?

Deep implant-associated infection requiring plate removal is the most common serious complication, with an implant removal rate of 3.5 to 7.5% of procedures (ResearchGate).

Osteomyelitis (0.6%) and tibial tuberosity fracture (1 to 9%) are other serious but less common complications.

Is a 10 to 34% complication rate high for an orthopedic surgery?

The range is real but the majority of complications are minor -- a seroma, mild superficial infection treated with antibiotics, or a brief period of increased lameness.

Serious complications requiring revision surgery are significantly less common. TPLO's overall success rate (93% limb function restoration at 1 year per a 2013 study) reflects that most dogs recover well.

Can complications be prevented?

Most can be reduced in risk but not eliminated.

Owner-controlled risk reduction: e-collar compliance, strict activity restriction for 8 to 12 weeks, daily incision inspection, and attending all scheduled vet appointments.

What happens if my dog develops two complications simultaneously?

This is uncommon but does occur (for example, SSI leading to delayed bone healing). Management is coordinated by your surgical team based on the severity and interaction of the complications.

Contact your vet immediately for any concern.

Should I be worried every time my dog limps?

A degree of lameness is expected throughout the recovery period. The key signal is trajectory: steadily improving lameness is expected; suddenly worsening or reversed lameness is not.

Monitor for any sudden changes and contact your vet for trajectory reversals.

Resources

• PMC. Surgical Site Infection After 769 TPLOs. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
• Laguna Woods Vets. TPLO Surgery Complications. lhah.com
• Dog Discoveries. TPLO Failure and Complications in Dogs. dogdiscoveries.com
• Clinician's Brief. Common Tibial Plateau-Leveling Osteotomy Complications. cliniciansbrief.com

If your dog has been diagnosed with a torn cranial cruciate ligament, you have likely encountered the acronym TPLO possibly before you knew what it meant or why it was being recommended.

TPLO is the most commonly performed CCL surgery in the US. Understanding what the acronym means helps demystify why the surgery works the way it does.

Quick answer: TPLO stands for Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy: Tibial (shin bone), Plateau (upper surface forming the knee), Leveling (making the plateau closer to horizontal), Osteotomy (controlled bone cut). The surgery stabilizes the knee by rotating the tibia, making the CCL biomechanically unnecessary.

Key takeaways

• T = Tibial: the tibia, the shin bone below the knee (stifle) joint
• P = Plateau: the upper tibial surface forming the knee joint; in dogs it has a significant slope called the tibial plateau angle
• L = Leveling: reducing the tibial plateau angle to closer to parallel with the ground, changing joint biomechanics
• O = Osteotomy: a controlled surgical bone cut that allows the tibial segment to be repositioned and fixed
• TPLO does not repair the torn CCL: it changes joint geometry so the ligament becomes biomechanically unnecessary
• TPLO was first described in the early 1980s by Dr. Barclay Slocum and is now the most reliable procedure for CCL disease in dogs

Breaking down each word

T Tibial

The tibia is the main weight-bearing bone of the lower leg, running from the knee (stifle) joint to the ankle (tarsus).

In dogs, the tibia is not perfectly vertical it angles slightly forward relative to the femur above it. This angle contributes to the mechanical forces that act on the stifle during weight-bearing.

Veterinary Partner (VIN) explains: tibial refers to the shin bone.

P Plateau

The tibial plateau is the upper, relatively flat surface of the tibia that contacts the bottom of the femur to form the stifle joint.

Unlike in humans, where the tibial plateau is nearly horizontal, in dogs it has a significant slope the tibial plateau angle (TPA).

A steeper TPA creates more cranial tibial thrust during weight-bearing, which is the force that normally the CCL resists.

Veterinary Partner (VIN) defines it as: the upper surface of the shin bone; the bottom of the knee joint.

L Leveling

Leveling refers to the goal of the surgery: reducing the tibial plateau angle to approximately 5 degrees, making it closer to parallel with the ground.

When the tibial plateau is leveled, the femur no longer tends to slide forward relative to the tibia during weight-bearing the cranial tibial thrust is neutralized.

This is why a functioning CCL is no longer required after TPLO.

Veterinary Partner (VIN) defines it as: making the plateau more parallel to the ground.

O Osteotomy

An osteotomy is a controlled surgical cut through a bone a deliberate, planned fracture performed under anesthesia to allow repositioning of a bone segment.

TPLO involves a curved osteotomy through the proximal tibia, creating a segment that is rotated to the new angle and fixed with a bone plate and screws during healing.

Veterinary Partner (VIN) defines it as: a bone-cutting procedure like a controlled fracture of the bone.

Why TPLO was developed

Before TPLO, the dominant approach to CCL repair was extracapsular stabilization placing sutures outside the joint to mimic the CCL's function.

While effective in small dogs, this approach was unreliable in large, active dogs because the suture material eventually stretched or failed, and the joint depended on periarticular scar tissue for long-term stability.

Veterinary Specialty Center explains: TPLO changes the biomechanics of the knee so the joint can remain stable without relying on the damaged CCL.

Instead of replacing the torn ligament, it changes the mechanics of the knee entirely.

DVM360 confirms: TPLO alters the mechanical forces acting on the stifle, rendering the cranial cruciate ligament unnecessary.

Dr. Barclay Slocum first described TPLO in the early 1980s.

Veterinary Partner (VIN) notes that much research has been done since to refine the technique, and it has emerged as the most reliable technique for CCL disease management in dogs.

How TPLO differs from human ACL surgery

This is one of the most common points of confusion for owners.

In humans, ACL surgery typically involves replacing the torn ligament with a graft (taken from the patient's hamstring, patellar tendon, or a donor).

The new ligament is reconstructed to restore normal joint function.

TPLO does not reconstruct the CCL. It bypasses the need for a functioning CCL entirely by changing joint geometry.

Veterinary Specialty Center confirms: in people, ACL surgery replaces the torn ligament; in dogs, TPLO changes knee mechanics so the joint functions without the CCL.

This is why dogs cannot "re-tear" their CCL after TPLO there is no ligament replacement to fail. The stability provided by TPLO is structural and permanent.

What TPLO treats and who it is for

TPLO is used to treat cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture the canine equivalent of the human ACL.

CCL rupture is the most common cause of hind limb lameness in dogs and costs US dog owners over $1 billion annually.

The ACVS recommends TPLO as the most commonly performed procedure for dogs over 60 lbs. It is also recommended for smaller dogs where long-term mechanical stability and minimal arthritis progression are priorities.

For the surgical causes guide, see what causes TPLO surgery to be needed in dogs. For the full surgical overview, see what is TPLO surgery in dogs?.

For the pros and cons of the procedure, see TPLO surgery pros and cons for dogs.

Frequently asked questions

Does TPLO stand for the same thing in all dogs?

Yes. The acronym and the procedure are the same regardless of breed, size, or the specific implant system used (Arthrex or Synthes).

The variation between cases is in the amount of tibial rotation required (based on the individual TPA), the plate size selected, and the post-operative protocol.

Is TPLO the same as TTA?

No. TTA (Tibial Tuberosity Advancement) is a different procedure with a similar goal both change knee biomechanics rather than replacing the CCL.

TTA advances the tibial tuberosity cranially rather than rotating the tibial plateau. They achieve knee stabilization through different geometric approaches.

Why is it called leveling if the bone is rotated?

The rotation of the tibial bone segment achieves the leveling.

When the proximal tibial segment is rotated, the angle of the tibial plateau changes it becomes less sloped, i.e., more level relative to the ground.

The procedure is named for the result (leveling) rather than the method (rotation).

Was TPLO invented for dogs?

Yes. TPLO was developed specifically for veterinary use in dogs in the early 1980s by Dr. Barclay Slocum.

It was developed because the canine stifle's anatomy and biomechanics differ significantly from the human knee particularly the steep tibial plateau angle that is uniquely problematic in dogs.

Why is TPLO preferred over other CCL surgeries for large dogs?

Large, active dogs generate higher joint forces than small dogs.

Extracapsular repair (lateral suture) provides stability through scar tissue formation adequate for small dogs but inadequate for the forces generated by large, active breeds.

TPLO provides bone-based mechanical stability that is not dependent on scar tissue, making it more durable and reliable for larger patients.

Resources

• Veterinary Partner (VIN). TPLO Surgery. veterinarypartner.vin.com
• VCA Animal Hospitals. Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy (TPLO). vcahospitals.com
• DVM360. Understanding Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomies in Dogs. dvm360.com
• Veterinary Specialty Center. TPLO Surgery for Dogs. vetspecialty.com
• ACVS. Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease. acvs.org