TPLO produces excellent long-term outcomes for most dogs with CCL rupture.

The published evidence covers follow-up periods from 1 year to 6.8 years post-surgery and consistently shows high rates of functional recovery alongside moderate but ongoing arthritis progression.

Understanding what the data shows helps owners set realistic expectations about what TPLO achieves and what ongoing management is required.

Quick answer: Published long-term TPLO outcomes: 90 to 95% of dogs regain complete or near-complete limb function; good to excellent results in 90.4% of patients at up to 6.8 years; 93% owner satisfaction at 12 months (RCVS). Arthritis progresses moderately in all CCL-affected stifles but TPLO produces less progression than TTA.

Key takeaways

• 90 to 95% of dogs regain complete or near-complete limb function: RCVS Canine Cruciate Registry confirms this range; 93% owner satisfaction at 12 months
• Good to excellent results in 90.4% of patients up to 6.8 years post-surgery: TPLO Info cites this long-term retrospective study, one of the longest published TPLO follow-up datasets
• Arthritis progresses in all CCL-affected joints regardless of surgical technique: TPLO slows progression compared to TTA and lateral suture but does not stop it
• TPLO produces better long-term outcomes than TTA in comparative studies: OA progressed more after TTA; TPLO dogs had less pain, better walking, less morning stiffness, and better quality of life at 3+ years per the 94-dog study
• TPLO produces better owner satisfaction than lateral suture: 93% vs. 75% for lateral fabellar suture per TPLO Info; kinematic gait analysis also favored TPLO
• Meniscal management at the time of TPLO affects long-term outcomes: dogs with partial meniscectomy had higher rates of excellent long-term results and less OA progression per TPLO Info

Functional outcomes: what the data shows

At 1 year post-surgery

A 2013 comparative study of TPLO vs. TTA found TPLO patients achieved 93% restoration of limb function at 1 year, as assessed by objective force plate analysis.

This is the most frequently cited 1-year outcome figure.

RCVS Canine Cruciate Registry confirms: 90 to 95% of dogs regain complete or near-complete function; 93% of owners report satisfaction at 12 months.

At 2 years post-surgery

A PMC long-term functional outcome study found that most dogs with CCL repair -- regardless of technique -- showed improvement in limb function at 2 years compared to pre-operative status.

Objective gait analysis at 2 years showed that the operated leg approached the contralateral leg in force plate measurements.

At 3+ years post-surgery

The comparative TPLO vs. TTA study with follow-up at 3+ years provides the clearest long-term comparative data:

• OA progressed more in TTA than in TPLO dogs
• TPLO dogs scored better on the Canine Brief Pain Inventory across all domains (average pain, walking interference, morning stiffness, jumping, climbing)
• TPLO dogs scored better on the Canine Orthopedic Index (quality of life)
• The study concluded TPLO provides better long-term radiographic and functional outcome than TTA

At up to 6.8 years post-surgery

TPLO Info cites a long-term retrospective study with follow-up extending to 6.8 years: good to excellent results were obtained in 90.4% of patients at this timeframe.

This is the longest published follow-up in a TPLO outcome dataset and confirms that the 90%+ functional recovery rate is durable over years rather than only at 12 months.

Arthritis: the universal long-term consideration

All dogs with CCL disease develop progressive osteoarthritis in the affected stifle. This is true regardless of whether surgical or conservative management is chosen.

TPLO reduces the rate of arthritis progression and the severity of clinical signs compared to lateral suture stabilization and TTA, but arthritis progression continues.

TPLO Info confirms: in the long term, there was a moderate but significant progression of OA following TPLO.

SustainableVet.org confirms: while TPLO stabilizes the knee and slows down arthritis progression, it does not completely eliminate the risk; mild arthritis is expected, even in successful cases.

Managing long-term arthritis after TPLO

Weight management: every additional kilogram of body weight increases stifle joint loading. Maintaining lean body condition is the single most impactful owner-controlled variable for arthritis management.

Joint supplements: glucosamine, chondroitin, and omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil) are commonly recommended and have evidence supporting modest benefit for joint health and comfort.

Low-impact exercise: regular, controlled exercise (walking, swimming, hydrotherapy) maintains muscle mass and joint lubrication without the impact forces of running and jumping. Consistent low-impact exercise is more beneficial than sporadic high-intensity sessions.

NSAIDs for flares: carprofen, meloxicam, or other veterinary NSAIDs are used for periods of increased arthritis pain. Long-term NSAID use requires periodic monitoring of renal and hepatic function.

Rehabilitation: an ongoing physiotherapy relationship with a certified canine rehabilitation practitioner helps maintain muscle mass and joint mobility as the dog ages.

Factors that affect long-term outcomes

Age at surgery: younger dogs typically achieve better long-term function than older dogs. Older dogs heal more slowly and have a higher baseline level of arthritis-related joint change before surgery.

Body weight: heavier dogs show more arthritis progression and more persistent lameness than lighter dogs at equivalent follow-up periods.

Meniscal management: TPLO Info confirms partial meniscectomy (when a meniscal tear is present) is associated with significantly higher rates of excellent long-term results and less OA progression compared to meniscal release or leaving the meniscus intact when abnormal.

Surgical timing: earlier intervention (before severe arthritis develops) produces better long-term outcomes. Dogs treated early in the disease process have less existing joint damage at the time of surgery.

Rehabilitation compliance: dogs that complete structured rehabilitation programs and achieve good muscle mass restoration have better long-term function than those managed with restricted activity alone.

Bilateral CCL disease: TPLO Info confirms OA progresses more in dogs with bilateral stifle surgery than unilateral. This may reflect the more severe underlying degenerative process in these dogs.

TPLO vs. lateral suture: long-term comparison

TPLO Info confirms owner satisfaction of 93% for TPLO vs. 75% for lateral fabellar suture; kinematic gait analysis also favored TPLO outcomes.

This comparison is most relevant for medium-sized dogs where both procedures are technically appropriate. For large dogs over 35 to 40 kg, TPLO consistently outperforms lateral suture in long-term outcomes.

For small dogs under 15 kg, lateral suture achieves comparable results at substantially lower cost.

TPLO vs. TTA: long-term comparison

SustainableVet.org confirms: when comparing TTA to TPLO, research suggests similar long-term arthritis outcomes in some studies, but TPLO patients usually recover faster and regain function sooner.

The 3+ year follow-up comparative study is the most comprehensive published comparison and clearly favors TPLO in both OA progression and functional/quality-of-life outcomes.

For the TPLO overview, see what is TPLO surgery in dogs?. For the long-term effects list, see 13 long-term effects of TPLO surgery on dogs.

For surgery comparisons, see TPLO vs CBLO vs TTA: a guide to cruciate surgery options. For arthritis management, see arthritis after TPLO surgery in dogs.

Frequently asked questions

Will my dog be completely normal after TPLO?

Most dogs return to their pre-injury activity level after full recovery.

RCVS and multiple studies confirm 90 to 95% regain complete or near-complete function.

"Completely normal" is achievable for most dogs, with the caveat that some mild arthritis develops over time in virtually all cases.

Dogs may show stiffness on cold days or after long rest periods as they age.

Does TPLO stop arthritis?

No -- it reduces and slows arthritis progression compared to conservative management and other surgical techniques, but does not stop it. All CCL-affected stifles develop progressive OA.

The goal of TPLO is to stabilize the joint and minimize the rate of arthritis development, not eliminate it.

How long does the TPLO plate last?

The plate is designed to be permanent.

Good to excellent results at 6.8 years (the longest published TPLO follow-up) with the plate in place demonstrates the durability of the implant in the overwhelming majority of cases.

Plate complications requiring removal occur in 3.5 to 7.5% of cases.

Is my dog at risk for the CCL on the other side?

Yes. RCVS confirms approximately 50% of dogs will develop CCL disease in the other hind limb.

This is not a consequence of TPLO -- it reflects the degenerative nature of CCL disease that typically affects both stifles. Monitoring the contralateral stifle is appropriate in all TPLO dogs.

Does the long-term outcome depend on the surgeon's experience?

Yes, to some degree. Surgeons with more TPLO experience have lower complication rates (including SSI and delayed union), and complications are associated with worse long-term outcomes.

Using a board-certified surgeon or an experienced general practitioner with dedicated TPLO training reduces risk. The published SSI studies confirm surgeon experience as an independent risk factor for post-TPLO complications.

Resources

• TPLO Info. TPLO Literature and Studies. tploinfo.com
• RCVS Canine Cruciate Registry. Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy (TPLO). rcvsknowledge.org
• PMC. Long-Term Functional Outcome After Surgical Repair of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease in Dogs. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
• SustainableVet. Long-Term Outcomes of TPLO Surgery. sustainablevet.org

Staphylococcus species are the most common cause of surgical site infections (SSI) after TPLO surgery in dogs.

The primary culprit is Staphylococcus pseudintermedius -- a bacterium that normally lives on the skin, nares, and perianal area of healthy dogs.

Understanding why this organism is so prevalent, how it produces infection, and what makes methicillin-resistant strains particularly challenging is essential for owners of TPLO dogs and the veterinary professionals treating them.

Quick answer: S. pseudintermedius is the most common cause of post-TPLO infection. MRSP accounted for 28% of infections in a 659-TPLO study. Signs include redness, swelling, warmth, and discharge -- or only lameness regression and plate-site swelling for deep implant infections. Culture and sensitivity testing is required; empirical treatment risks selecting for further resistance.

Key takeaways

• S. pseudintermedius is the most frequently identified pathogen in TPLO infections: a normal skin commensal in dogs; the PMC 769-TPLO study identified it in 37 of 65 SSI cases
• MRSP accounted for 28% of infections in a 659-TPLO study: a high proportion of resistant organisms in a single surgical population; MRSP does not respond to many first-line antibiotics
• Biofilm formation on the TPLO plate makes staph infections difficult to treat: once established on the metal plate, bacteria are protected from antibiotics; deep implant infections often require plate removal
• Signs of staph infection range from visible wound changes to none: superficial infections produce redness, warmth, and discharge; implant infections may show only lameness regression and plate-site swelling
• Diagnosis requires bacterial culture and sensitivity testing: MRSP cannot be diagnosed visually; empirical antibiotic treatment without culture risks selecting for further resistance
• Pre-operative MRSP carriage significantly increases SSI risk: preoperative MRSP colonization is an independent risk factor; dogs with known carriage require enhanced perioperative protocol

Why S. pseudintermedius is so prevalent in TPLO SSI

It is a normal resident of dog skin

S. pseudintermedius colonizes the skin, nares, and perianal area of most dogs as part of their normal flora. It is present on the surgical preparation area even after antiseptic skin preparation.

The preparation reduces the bacterial load but does not sterilize the skin.

SustainableVet.org confirms: S. pseudintermedius is naturally found on a dog's skin; in healthy dogs it rarely causes issues, but after TPLO surgery it can infect the surgical incision and implants.

The TPLO plate provides a preferred colonization surface

Metal implants dramatically lower the minimum infective dose -- the number of bacteria required to establish infection. On a plate surface, S. pseudintermedius can form biofilm with far fewer organisms than required to infect soft tissue alone.

SustainableVet.org confirms: TPLO surgeries are particularly prone to infection because of the metal implants, which provide a surface for bacteria to stick to and form biofilms.

Licking introduces oral cavity organisms to the incision

The oral cavity of dogs is also colonized with S. pseudintermedius. When a dog licks the incision, it introduces additional bacteria directly to the wound.

This is the most common mechanism of avoidable post-TPLO SSI.

ResearchGate MRSA TPLO case report confirms: the dog licked the surgical site, causing dehiscence, and MRSA was detected from the purulent discharge. This underscores the critical importance of e-collar compliance.

MRSP: the resistant strain that complicates treatment

MRSP (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius) is resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics via the mecA gene -- the same mechanism as MRSA in humans. Cephalexin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and most penicillins are ineffective.

Why MRSP is a particular challenge in TPLO

Most perioperative antibiotic protocols use cefazolin (a cephalosporin). MRSP is resistant to cephalosporins by definition.

If a dog unknowingly colonized with MRSP receives cefazolin prophylaxis, the MRSP is not suppressed. If it reaches the plate, it establishes infection against which standard first-line antibiotics are ineffective.

SustainableVet.org confirms: MRSP has developed resistance to many commonly used antibiotics, making infections harder to treat and increasing the risk of complications.

MRSP incidence in TPLO infections

ResearchGate TPLO MRSA/MRSP study (659 TPLO procedures, SSI rate 11%): MRSP accounted for 20 of 71 infections (28%). This is a high proportion of resistant organisms in a post-surgical population.

Antibiotic options for MRSP

First-line options for susceptible S. pseudintermedius (cephalexin, amoxicillin-clavulanate) do not work for MRSP. Culture and sensitivity testing is required to identify effective agents. Common options based on sensitivity results include:

• Chloramphenicol: effective against many MRSP; requires bone marrow monitoring
• Clindamycin: effective if sensitivity confirmed; not all MRSP strains
• Doxycycline: bacteriostatic; used for some superficial MRSP infections
• Rifampin (rifampicin): excellent biofilm penetration; always combined with another agent to prevent resistance; used for implant-associated MRSP
• Vancomycin: last resort; the MRSA TPLO case report describes a rifampin-vancomycin combination resolving MRSA infection that persisted despite implant removal and vancomycin alone

SustainableVet.org confirms: one of the biggest challenges in treating staph infections after TPLO is the presence of multidrug-resistant bacteria, particularly MRSP; this strain has developed resistance to many commonly used antibiotics.

Signs of post-TPLO staph infection

Superficial incisional infection (SSI-S)

• Redness spreading beyond the incision line (after day 5)
• Warmth at the incision site increasing rather than decreasing
• Swelling that is not resolving or is increasing
• Discharge: cloudy, yellow, green, or malodorous from the incision
• Wound edges that are not healing or are separating

Deep implant-associated infection (SSI-D)

• New or worsening lameness after a period of improvement
• Swelling over the plate site (not necessarily at the incision)
• Warmth specifically at the plate site on palpation
• A draining tract opening near but not at the incision (typically weeks to months post-surgery)
• No discharge from the original incision despite significant clinical signs

SustainableVet.org confirms: signs of infection include redness, swelling, warmth around the incision, pus-like discharge, an unpleasant odor, and increased pain or tenderness.

Diagnosis

Wound swab culture: taken from discharge at the incision or from the draining tract. Provides the organism identification and sensitivity profile.

Deep tissue culture: more accurate than wound swabs because it avoids surface contamination. Obtained at surgery (arthrotomy or plate removal).

Plate surface culture: the most sensitive diagnostic for implant-associated infection. Obtained when the plate is removed.

Imaging: radiographs assess peri-implant bone changes (radiolucent halos, periosteal reaction); advanced imaging (CT) may be used for complex deep infections.

The PMC 769-TPLO study confirmed: bacterial culture was positive in 72% of samples submitted when SSI was first suspected.

Treatment

Superficial infection: culture-directed oral antibiotics for 2 to 4 weeks; wound cleaning; e-collar compliance to prevent licking; local wound care.

Deep implant-associated infection: surgical debridement (lavage and debridement of the plate site); culture; culture-directed antibiotics for 4 to 8 weeks; plate retention if the osteotomy is not yet healed (with the understanding that complete resolution may require later plate removal); plate removal once the osteotomy has healed.

MRSP-specific: culture results guide antibiotic selection. Rifampin combinations are used for biofilm-associated implant infections. Veterinary infectious disease consultation is appropriate for complex MRSP cases.

For the infection prevention guide, see how can TPLO infections be prevented post-operatively?. For MRSP specifically, see can MRSP or MRSA occur after TPLO surgery?.

For the SSI rate data, see how common are infections after TPLO surgery?. For the antibiotic guide, see antibiotics commonly used for TPLO infections.

Frequently asked questions

My dog had a culture and it came back as S. pseudintermedius. Is that MRSP?

Not necessarily. S. pseudintermedius can be methicillin-susceptible (MSSP) or methicillin-resistant (MRSP). The sensitivity panel on the culture report will indicate whether the organism is susceptible to cephalexin and other beta-lactam antibiotics.

If susceptible, it is MSSP and responds to standard first-line drugs. If resistant to cephalosporins, it is MRSP and requires second-line agents.

Can I prevent staph infection after TPLO?

Licking prevention (e-collar compliance for 10 to 14 days) is the single most impactful owner-controlled prevention measure. Licking is the most common avoidable cause of post-TPLO SSI.

Wound dryness, clean bedding, limited environmental contamination, and daily wound inspection are additional preventive measures.

My dog finished the antibiotic course but the discharge came back. What does that mean?

Recurrence after antibiotic completion most commonly indicates biofilm-associated implant infection that was suppressed but not eradicated by antibiotics. Plate removal is likely needed for definitive resolution.

Contact your vet immediately -- do not wait to see if it resolves again.

Can my dog spread MRSP to other dogs or people?

MRSP is primarily a veterinary pathogen. It is less commonly transmitted to humans than MRSA, but zoonotic transmission has been documented.

Standard hygiene measures (hand washing after wound care, gloves for wound dressing changes, avoiding face contact with the infected wound) are appropriate precautions during treatment.

How long does it take to clear a deep staph infection after TPLO?

Deep implant-associated infections typically require 4 to 8 weeks of culture-directed antibiotics plus plate removal once the osteotomy is healed.

MRSP infections that involve biofilm and require rifampin combinations may take 3 to 6 months of total treatment. Osteomyelitis extends this further.

Long courses are necessary because biofilm-associated bacteria are protected from antibiotics and resistant populations can regrow when treatment stops.

Resources

• PMC. Surgical Site Infection After 769 TPLOs. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
• ResearchGate. Treatment of MRSA Infection Following TPLO in a Dog. researchgate.net
• SustainableVet. Staph Infection After TPLO Surgery. sustainablevet.org
• SustainableVet. Is Staph the Most Common Infection After TPLO Surgery? sustainablevet.org

A seroma is one of the most common soft tissue complications after TPLO surgery in dogs.

Finding a soft lump under the skin near the surgical site is alarming, but in most cases it is a benign finding that resolves with strict rest and time.

Understanding the difference between a seroma and a more serious complication helps you respond appropriately.

Quick answer: A seroma is clear serum fluid under the TPLO incision, not an infection. Small seromas resolve in 1 to 3 weeks with rest; larger ones need sterile aspiration. Call your vet if the swelling is hot, fast-growing, or producing discharge.

Key takeaways

• A seroma is clear serum fluid under the skin — not an infection; a benign accumulation from disrupted blood and lymphatic vessels
• Excessive activity is the leading preventable cause: unnecessary movement produces more fluid and enlarges the seroma
• Small seromas resolve with strict rest in 1 to 3 weeks: the lymphatic system reabsorbs the fluid without intervention
• Large seromas may need needle aspiration: a sterile outpatient procedure by your vet; never drain at home
• Warm packs twice daily help reabsorption: 10 minutes of warmth twice daily is recommended for established seromas
• A seroma that becomes warm, red, painful, or produces discharge needs immediate vet attention it may have become infected

What is a seroma?

Vetinfo explains that a seroma is a swelling resulting from the accumulation of fluid under the skin.

It is made of serous fluid (blood plasma without most of the cells), so it is usually watery with a slight pink tinge rather than dark blood or cloudy infected fluid.

After TPLO surgery, the osteotomy site and surrounding soft tissues leave behind a space between tissue layers called dead space where fluid from disrupted capillaries and lymphatics can collect.

The fluid pools there before the body's healing processes close the space.

Seromas feel soft, fluctuant (squishy), and move under finger pressure. They are usually not painful when small and are not warm to the touch.

These features distinguish them from infections, which are typically warm, firm, painful, and may produce purulent discharge.

What causes seromas after TPLO?

Excessive activity

This is the most important and most preventable cause. Vetinfo confirms that seromas occur when a dog is active immediately after surgery instead of remaining inactive during recovery.

Every unnecessary step disrupts the tissue planes that need to approximate and seal, producing more fluid.

The surgeon Dr.

Matt confirms on JustAnswer that the best way to reduce seromas is to restrict activity as much as possible at least 8 weeks of restricted activity after TPLO is recommended.

Dead space at the surgical site

TPLO surgery involves significant soft tissue dissection around the proximal tibia. Closing this space with sutures reduces but does not eliminate dead space.

Any gap between tissue layers fills with fluid before normal healing closes it.

Surgical drainage

In some cases, surgical drains are placed during the procedure to allow fluid to escape rather than collect.

Not all surgeons routinely place drains some reserve them for dogs considered at higher risk of seroma formation.

Patient factors

Larger dogs produce more dead space and more fluid. Dogs with more subcutaneous fat are at higher risk.

Dogs that are particularly active during recovery despite attempts at confinement are most likely to develop significant seromas.

Recognizing a seroma

Classic signs:

• Soft, squishy swelling directly under or near the incision site
• The swelling moves under pressure it feels like a water balloon
• Normal skin color over the swelling (not red or purple)
• Not painful when gentle pressure is applied
• Not warm to the touch
• No discharge from the skin over the swelling

When to suspect infection instead:

• The swelling is warm, red, or firm rather than soft
• A draining tract or discharge appears from the skin
• The dog shows increased pain, fever, lethargy, or loss of appetite
• The swelling is growing rapidly

Treatment

Small seromas: observation and rest

Cuteness notes that most often the body absorbs the fluid and the swelling diminishes. For small seromas (typically under 3 cm), the approach is:

• Enforce strict activity restriction no running, jumping, or free roaming
• Cold compresses in the first few days (reduces new fluid production)
• Warm compresses from days 5 onward 10 minutes, twice daily to promote fluid reabsorption
• Monitor size and character daily

Large or persistent seromas: needle aspiration

Large seromas that are uncomfortable or not responding to rest may be drained by your veterinarian using a sterile needle and syringe. This is a simple outpatient procedure.

Cuteness confirms that veterinarians may drain or aspirate the seroma to make the dog more comfortable.

Aspiration provides relief but does not address the underlying dead space. The seroma may refill sometimes multiple aspirations are required. After aspiration, continued strict rest is essential.

Compression bandaging

A gentle compression bandage applied by your vet reduces dead space and discourages fluid refilling after aspiration.

Improper bandaging can cause pressure sores or circulatory compromise, so bandages must be applied and monitored by a veterinarian.

Surgical drain placement

If a seroma repeatedly refills after aspiration, a closed suction drain may be placed to allow ongoing drainage until the dead space closes.

This is uncommon but is an option for persistent or large seromas.

For the full fluid buildup guide covering all types of post-TPLO fluid accumulation, see fluid buildup after TPLO surgery in dogs.

For incision complications including infection, see TPLO incision infection symptoms and prevention. For the full complications reference, see 15 common complications after TPLO surgery in dogs.

For the incision redness guide to distinguish seroma from infection, see redness after TPLO surgery in dogs: causes and care.

Frequently asked questions

Can a seroma go away on its own?

Yes in the majority of cases, small seromas resolve without intervention as the body reabsorbs the fluid over 1 to 3 weeks.

Strict activity restriction is essential; without it, the seroma will continue to refill as fast as it drains.

Do not assume a seroma will resolve if the dog is not being properly confined.

Should I drain the seroma myself at home?

Never. Home drainage risks introducing bacteria into a sterile fluid collection, converting a benign seroma into an infected abscess. Only a veterinarian should aspirate a seroma under sterile conditions.

If you believe the seroma needs draining, contact your vet.

My dog's seroma looks like it ruptured through the skin. What do I do?

Spontaneous seroma rupture does occasionally occur. The fluid drains through the skin, leaving a small wound.

Contact your vet immediately for guidance the wound will need to be kept clean and monitored for infection. A veterinarian Dr.

Matt reports this occurrence on JustAnswer, confirming prompt vet contact is appropriate.

How long does a seroma last after TPLO?

Small seromas typically resolve in 1 to 3 weeks with strict activity restriction. Larger ones may take 4 to 6 weeks and may require aspiration.

If a seroma persists beyond 4 weeks without improvement, a veterinary recheck is warranted.

Is a seroma the same as an infection?

No. A seroma is sterile fluid no bacteria. An infection involves bacterial colonization and produces different characteristics: warmth, redness, purulent discharge, systemic illness signs.

Bacterial culture distinguishes them definitively if clinical assessment is uncertain.

Resources

• Vetinfo. Seroma After-Surgery Care for Dogs. vetinfo.com
• Cuteness. What Are the Treatments for Seroma Formation in Dogs? cuteness.com
• VCA Animal Hospitals. Seroma in Dogs. vcahospitals.com
• TPLO Info. Recovery FAQs. tploinfo.com

TPLO is the most commonly performed surgery for CCL rupture in dogs and the most commonly misunderstood.

Misconceptions about TPLO cause unnecessary hesitation, lead some owners to choose inferior alternatives, and create unrealistic expectations about recovery.

This guide addresses the 10 most common myths directly -- with evidence-based clarification for each.

Quick answer: The most persistent TPLO myths: that dogs can manage without surgery, that TPLO is only for large breeds, that recovery takes a few weeks, that the plate must be removed after healing, and that TPLO prevents arthritis. All are false. TPLO has a 90 to 95% success rate.

Key takeaways

• Myth: "My dog can heal without surgery": dog knee anatomy differs fundamentally from human; without surgery, severe OA, meniscal tearing, and chronic lameness are expected in most dogs over 15 kg
• Myth: "TPLO is only for large dogs": SustainableVet.org confirms TPLO is just as effective for small and toy breeds; the biomechanical correction is appropriate regardless of size
• Myth: "Recovery only takes a few weeks": bone healing takes 8 to 12 weeks; full muscle recovery takes 4 to 6 months; 8 to 12 weeks is the minimum restriction period
• Myth: "The plate needs to be removed after healing": the TPLO plate is designed to be permanent; removal is only performed when complications arise
• Myth: "TPLO prevents arthritis": all CCL-affected stifles develop progressive OA regardless of surgical technique; TPLO reduces OA progression but does not prevent it
• Myth: "Dogs are in severe pain after TPLO": SustainableVet.org confirms this is a misconception; modern multi-modal pain management controls post-surgical pain effectively

Myth 1: "My dog can heal without surgery"

The truth: dogs and humans have fundamentally different knee anatomy. In humans, the flat tibial plateau and strong surrounding musculature allow some CCL tears to be managed conservatively with physical therapy and bracing. In dogs, the tibial plateau slopes steeply downward, generating a cranial shear force that the absent CCL cannot resist. Without surgical correction of this force, the joint remains mechanically unstable with every weight-bearing step.

TPLO Info confirms: dogs and humans respond very differently to CCL tears. Without surgery, severe OA can develop, meniscal tearing can occur, and other side effects may be present.

Conservative management (strict rest, weight management, joint supplements, physical therapy) can provide temporary improvement, particularly in small dogs and partial tears.

For most dogs over 15 kg with complete CCL rupture, conservative management does not restore normal joint stability, and progressive lameness, OA, and joint deterioration are the expected outcome.

Who can be managed conservatively?

• Very small dogs (under 10 to 15 kg) with partial tears and low activity levels
• Dogs with significant comorbidities where anesthetic risk outweighs surgical benefit
• Owners who decline surgery after being fully informed of expected outcomes

For all other dogs -- medium and large breeds, young dogs, active dogs, complete ruptures -- surgery produces substantially better outcomes than conservative management.

Myth 2: "TPLO is only for large dogs"

The truth: TPLO was originally developed for large and giant breeds because they were the most severely affected by CCL disease and the most poorly served by lateral suture stabilization. But TPLO corrects the underlying biomechanical problem (excessive tibial plateau angle) in any dog, regardless of size.

SustainableVet.org confirms: TPLO was initially developed for large dogs due to biomechanical challenges, but has been found just as effective for small and toy breeds.

For small dogs, both TPLO and lateral suture stabilization can achieve good outcomes.

The decision for a small dog should be based on the dog's TPA, activity level, and individual assessment -- not a blanket assumption that TPLO is unnecessary.

Myth 3: "TPLO recovery only takes a few weeks"

The truth: bone healing takes 8 to 12 weeks. This is the period of activity restriction. But bone healing and functional recovery are not the same thing. Full muscle rebuilding and joint function restoration takes 4 to 6 months from surgery.

Canada Vet Express confirms: recovery is gradual; most dogs begin walking within a few days and return to normal activity within 3 to 4 months with proper care.

The 8 to 12 week bone healing timeline means:

• Activity restrictions are in place for 8 to 12 weeks minimum
• Radiographic confirmation of healing is required before restrictions are lifted
• Progressive return to full activity follows the radiographic clearance

After restrictions are lifted, the operated leg continues to rebuild strength and coordination for months. For sport dogs and working dogs, the return-to-sport protocol extends to 7 to 9 months from surgery.

Myth 4: "The TPLO plate needs to be removed after the bone heals"

The truth: the plate is designed to remain in place permanently. It does not need to be removed when the osteotomy heals. Routine plate removal is not standard practice in veterinary orthopedics.

SustainableVet.org confirms: these implants are meant to stay in place permanently, but in rare cases they can cause problems; removal is only performed when complications arise.

When plate removal is performed:

• Deep implant-associated infection requiring source removal
• Implant failure (breakage, loosening causing instability)
• Persistent implant irritation producing clinical lameness specifically attributable to the plate

In the vast majority of dogs, the plate is never removed. It remains in place for life with no adverse effects.

Myth 5: "TPLO prevents arthritis"

The truth: TPLO reduces and slows arthritis progression. It does not prevent it. All CCL-affected stifles develop progressive OA regardless of surgical technique or outcome.

SustainableVet.org confirms: mild arthritis is expected even in successful cases.

Published long-term data (TPLO Info, citing long-term retrospective studies) confirms moderate but significant OA progression in all TPLO cohorts with follow-up extending to 6.8 years.

TPLO produces substantially less OA progression than TTA or lateral suture stabilization, but OA progression is universal.

The appropriate expectation: TPLO minimizes OA development and clinical impact. Long-term management (weight management, exercise modification, joint supplements, and periodic NSAID use for flares) is required in all TPLO dogs.

Myth 6: "Dogs are in severe pain after TPLO"

The truth: modern veterinary anesthesia and pain management protocols produce well-controlled post-operative pain in TPLO dogs. Dogs typically begin bearing some weight within 24 to 48 hours. Pain that is not controlled is a clinical problem requiring medication adjustment -- not an expected feature of TPLO recovery.

SustainableVet.org confirms: it is a misconception that dogs experience severe pain after TPLO surgery; modern multi-modal pain management controls post-surgical pain effectively.

Post-operative pain management typically includes: NSAIDs (carprofen, meloxicam), gabapentin, opioids during hospitalization, local anesthetic nerve blocks at surgery.

Dogs in adequate pain control rest comfortably, bear some weight within days, and show appetite by day 3.

Uncontrolled post-operative pain (dog cannot settle, crying, refuses all weight bearing beyond day 3) indicates a need for pain medication adjustment -- contact your vet rather than accepting it as inevitable.

Myth 7: "TPLO is too risky for most dogs"

The truth: TPLO has a 90 to 95% success rate. The complication rate across all studies is 10 to 34%, but the vast majority of complications are minor (superficial infection, seroma, mild swelling). Serious complications requiring revision surgery occur in fewer than 10% of cases.

Dispomed confirms: overall complication rates are 14 to 34%, but a second surgery is required in less than 10% of cases.

No surgery is without risk.

But for a dog with a torn CCL, the risk of TPLO is substantially lower than the certainty of progressive joint deterioration, pain, and reduced quality of life without surgical treatment.

Myth 8: "TPLO is only for show dogs or working dogs"

The truth: TPLO is appropriate for any dog with CCL rupture that will benefit from restored joint stability -- including middle-aged household pets with no competitive goals.

SustainableVet.org confirms: some pet owners mistakenly believe that TPLO surgery is only for show dogs or high-performance athletes; this is not true; TPLO benefits any dog with CCL disease.

The goal of TPLO is freedom from joint pain and restored ability to perform normal daily activities -- walking, playing, using stairs, sitting and rising comfortably.

These are benefits for every dog, not just sport dogs.

Myth 9: "All dogs with CCL tears need TPLO immediately"

The truth: TPLO is not always an emergency. The timing of surgery should be guided by the veterinary assessment. Partial tears in small dogs may be monitored with conservative management. Dogs with significant concurrent illness may benefit from medical optimization before surgery. The appropriate goal is surgical timing that optimizes anesthetic risk and surgical conditions, not surgical urgency at any cost.

SustainableVet.org confirms: while TPLO surgery is the best treatment for CCL tears, it isn't necessary for every case; for mild or partial tears in less active dogs, alternatives can be effective.

However, in dogs with complete rupture, particularly larger breeds, delay generally produces worse outcomes as OA progresses and the meniscus is exposed to ongoing mechanical insult from the unstable joint.

Myth 10: "If TPLO fails, the dog will never recover"

The truth: most TPLO complications are treatable. Superficial infections resolve with antibiotics. Late meniscal tears are treated with partial meniscectomy. Implant failures can be revised. Osteomyelitis, the most challenging complication, requires prolonged treatment but is often successfully managed.

SustainableVet.org confirms: revision TPLO surgery can be performed if the initial procedure fails; this may involve removing or replacing implants, repositioning the tibial cut, or addressing infections.

The critical factor in outcome from a complication is early detection and prompt treatment. Most complications that are identified and treated early resolve without long-term sequelae.

For the full TPLO overview, see what is TPLO surgery in dogs?. For the success rate data, see TPLO failure rate in dogs. For recovery, see what to expect after TPLO surgery.

For alternatives, see alternatives to TPLO surgery for dogs.

Frequently asked questions

Is TPLO actually the best treatment for CCL rupture?

For most dogs over 15 to 20 kg, TPLO is the most evidence-supported surgical option, producing the highest rates of long-term function and owner satisfaction in the published literature.

For small dogs, lateral suture stabilization achieves comparable results at lower cost. The choice depends on the individual dog's size, activity level, TPA, and health status.

Can I wait and see how my dog does without surgery?

You can choose conservative management.

The expected outcome in most dogs over 15 kg with complete CCL rupture who do not have surgery is progressive lameness, rapidly advancing OA, ongoing meniscal damage, and reduced quality of life.

Early surgical intervention consistently produces better long-term outcomes than delayed or non-surgical management.

Is the recovery really as strict as described?

Yes. The restriction protocol exists because the plate holds the osteotomy until new bone consolidates -- a process that takes 8 to 12 weeks regardless of how well the dog appears.

A single running or jumping episode before healing is confirmed can displace the plate and require revision surgery.

Will my dog be the same dog after TPLO?

Most owners report their dog is effectively the same dog -- or better than before the CCL rupture -- within 6 to 12 months of surgery.

The 90 to 95% success rate reflects a high proportion of dogs returning to their previous activity level.

Some dogs develop mild age-related stiffness years later as OA progresses, but this is manageable with appropriate care.

Does TPLO cure the CCL problem permanently?

TPLO permanently corrects the biomechanical cause of CCL-related instability in the operated stifle. It does not repair or replace the CCL -- it makes the CCL unnecessary.

It does not prevent CCL disease in the contralateral stifle.

Resources

• SustainableVet. Common Myths About TPLO Surgery Explained. sustainablevet.org
• TPLO Info. 5 Misconceptions About TPLO Surgery. tploinfo.com
• Dispomed. TPLO Surgery in Dogs: Success Rates and Alternatives. dispomed.com
• ACVS. Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease. acvs.org

TPLO (tibial plateau leveling osteotomy) is the most widely performed surgery for cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture in dogs.

It is the procedure most commonly recommended by board-certified veterinary surgeons for medium and large dogs, and it has the most extensive published evidence base of any CCL repair technique.

Understanding what TPLO is, why it works, and what recovery involves helps owners make informed decisions and prepare for the process.

Quick answer: TPLO (tibial plateau leveling osteotomy) corrects CCL rupture by changing tibial plateau geometry to eliminate the shear force making the CCL unnecessary. A curved cut is made through the tibia, rotated to 5 degrees, and secured with a locking plate while the bone heals. Success rate is 90 to 95%.

Key takeaways

• TPLO stands for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: it levels the tibial plateau through a bone cut to stabilize the stifle without relying on the damaged CCL
• TPLO corrects CCL rupture by eliminating the shear force the CCL resists: it changes the tibial plateau geometry so the joint is stable without a CCL
• The procedure achieves a post-operative tibial plateau angle of approximately 5 degrees: VCA confirms the tibial plateau is rotated until appropriately level (ideally 5 degrees), eliminating cranial tibial thrust
• TPLO has a 90 to 95% success rate: RCVS confirms 90 to 95% of dogs regain complete or near-complete function; 93% of owners report satisfaction at 12 months
• Recovery requires 8 to 12 weeks of activity restriction for bone healing; progressive return to full activity follows; muscle recovery takes up to 6 months
• TPLO is the most commonly recommended procedure for CCL rupture by ACVS surgeons in dogs over approximately 15 to 20 kg

The CCL and why it ruptures

The cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) is the equivalent of the human ACL in dogs.

It connects the femur (thigh bone) to the tibia (shin bone) inside the stifle (knee) joint and serves three primary functions:

• Preventing the tibia from sliding forward relative to the femur during weight bearing
• Limiting internal rotation of the tibia
• Preventing hyperextension of the stifle

Unlike most human ACL tears (which are acute traumatic events), CCL rupture in dogs is typically degenerative. The fibers weaken progressively over months to years before the ligament fails completely.

By the time complete rupture occurs, most of the fibers have already been compromised.

This is why the contralateral (opposite) CCL is also at risk -- the same degenerative process typically affects both stifles.

When the CCL ruptures, the tibial plateau's natural slope creates an unconstrained cranial shear force during weight bearing.

The femur slides down the tibial plateau, the tibia shifts forward, and the dog is in pain and unable to use the leg normally.

CCL rupture is one of the most common orthopedic injuries in dogs. High-risk breeds include Labrador Retrievers, Rottweilers, Staffordshire Terriers, Mastiffs, Newfoundlands, and German Shepherds.

Neutered dogs have a higher risk than intact dogs of the same breed.

How TPLO works: the biomechanical principle

The normal canine tibial plateau slopes downward from front to back at approximately 23 to 29 degrees (the tibial plateau angle, or TPA).

When the dog bears weight, this slope creates a cranial shear force -- the tibia tries to slide forward relative to the femur. In a normal stifle, the CCL resists this force.

When the CCL is absent, the force is unopposed and the joint is unstable.

TPLO does not attempt to restore the CCL. Instead, it eliminates the shear force entirely.

By rotating the tibial plateau to approximately 5 degrees, the joint surface becomes level enough that the patellar tendon -- rather than the CCL -- provides the stabilizing force during weight bearing.

The joint is mechanically stable without any ligament. The need for the CCL is eliminated by changing the geometry of the tibial plateau.

Dispomed confirms: TPLO addresses CCL rupture by altering the biomechanics of the stifle. The tibial plateau normally slopes downward; TPLO creates a flat or level plateau, decreasing sliding motion at this joint.

The TPLO procedure: step by step

Pre-operative planning

Before surgery, the dog is sedated and lateral stifle radiographs are taken.

The surgeon measures the TPA from these images and calculates the amount of rotation required to achieve the target post-operative TPA of approximately 5 degrees.

The surgeon also selects the appropriate saw blade radius and implant size based on these measurements and the dog's body weight.

Anesthesia and preparation

The dog is placed under general anesthesia. The surgical site is clipped and prepared with antiseptic solution. IV antibiotics (typically cefazolin) are given before the incision.

Joint inspection and meniscal assessment

The surgeon makes an incision over the medial aspect of the proximal tibia and performs a small arthrotomy (opening into the joint) to inspect the menisci.

Damaged meniscal tissue is removed at this stage.

Chewy confirms: during surgery, the joint is examined and the surgeon might remove damaged tissue before proceeding with the osteotomy.

The osteotomy

Using a specialized oscillating saw blade, the surgeon makes a curved (arcuate) cut through the proximal tibia at the level of the tibial plateau.

The radius of this cut is determined by the pre-operative planning.

Rotation

The cut bone segment (containing the tibial plateau) is rotated backward (caudally) by the calculated amount to achieve the target TPA.

VCA Animal Hospitals confirms: the top section of the tibia is rotated backward until deemed appropriately level -- typically 2 to 14 degrees, with 5 degrees as the ideal angle.

Plate fixation

A TPLO plate (a contoured locking plate) is secured to the tibia across the osteotomy using locking screws. The plate holds the rotated tibial plateau in position while the bone heals.

Closure

The joint capsule, fascia, subcutaneous tissue, and skin are closed in layers. The incision is bandaged.

Success rate and outcomes

RCVS Canine Cruciate Registry confirms: TPLO has a 90 to 95% success rate, with 90 to 95% of dogs regaining complete or near-complete function; 93% of owners reporting satisfaction at 12 months.

A 2013 study found that TPLO patients achieved 93% restoration of limb function at 1 year.

TPLO produces better long-term outcomes than lateral suture stabilization in most studies of large dogs, and similar long-term outcomes to TTA in comparable patient populations.

RCVS confirms: all dogs with CCL rupture are expected to develop at least some osteoarthritis, but this is reduced or delayed in dogs that have had surgical stabilization.

Recovery overview

• Weeks 0 to 2: crate rest, 5-minute bathroom leash walks only, e-collar on at all times
• Weeks 2 to 6: graduated leash walk increase, passive range-of-motion exercises
• Week 6: radiographic assessment of bone healing; activity increase if healing is progressing
• Weeks 8 to 12: final radiographic confirmation of bone healing; activity restrictions lifted if healing is confirmed
• Months 3 to 6: progressive return to full activity; muscle recovery continues

For the full recovery guide, see what to expect after TPLO surgery in dogs. For the surgery comparisons, see TPLO vs CBLO vs TTA: a guide to cruciate surgery options.

For preparation, see preparing for your dog's TPLO surgery. For the signs that TPLO may be needed, see 13 signs your dog may need TPLO surgery.

Frequently asked questions

Is TPLO the only surgery for CCL rupture in dogs?

No. The main alternatives are lateral suture stabilization (extracapsular repair), TTA (tibial tuberosity advancement), and CBLO (CORA-based leveling osteotomy). Lateral suture achieves good outcomes in dogs under approximately 35 pounds.

TTA produces similar long-term outcomes to TPLO in appropriately selected dogs. CBLO is used mainly for immature dogs and revision surgery cases.

Can a dog live without surgery for CCL rupture?

Small dogs (under 10 to 15 kg) sometimes stabilize adequately with conservative management (strict rest, weight management, joint support).

For most dogs over 15 kg, conservative management does not restore normal joint stability and the dog remains in pain with progressive arthritis.

Surgery is strongly recommended for most medium and large dogs.

How long does TPLO surgery take?

The procedure typically takes 1.5 to 2 hours. Bilateral simultaneous TPLO takes 3 to 4 hours.

Does the TPLO plate stay in permanently?

Yes, in most cases. The plate is not routinely removed after the osteotomy heals. It is removed if it causes complications (infection, implant irritation, failure).

What is the cost of TPLO surgery?

TPLO typically costs $3,500 to $6,000 per stifle depending on the facility, surgeon, geographic location, and the dog's size.

This typically includes the surgical procedure, anesthesia, hospitalization, implants, and the immediate post-operative period.

Resources

• RCVS Canine Cruciate Registry. Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy (TPLO). rcvsknowledge.org
• VCA Animal Hospitals. TPLO. vcahospitals.com
• Dispomed. TPLO Surgery in Dogs: Success Rates and Alternatives. dispomed.com
• ACVS. Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease. acvs.org

After TPLO surgery, one of the most important questions owners and rehabilitation teams ask is: how much weight should my dog be putting on the operated leg right now?

The Arthrex TPLO weight chart provides a structured, week-by-week answer to that question, giving both surgeons and owners a shared reference point for tracking recovery progress.

Quick answer: The Arthrex TPLO weight chart tracks the percentage of body weight a dog bears on the operated leg at each recovery stage — from 0 to 10% in the first weeks to 100% by 8 to 12 weeks post-surgery.

Key takeaways

• The weight chart tracks weight-bearing percentage at each stage, from 0 to 10% in weeks 1 to 2 to 100% by weeks 8 to 12
• It is a rehabilitation monitoring tool, not a surgical planning tool: the rotation chart governs intraoperative correction; this tracks recovery
• Progression must be gradual: advancing too fast risks implant failure; too slow leads to atrophy and stiffness
• The chart integrates with clinical examination: 8-week radiographs, gait assessment, and muscle mass evaluation are considered alongside chart milestones
• Individual dogs vary: the chart provides population-level benchmarks; your surgeon's instructions take precedence
• The chart is used alongside the plate size and rotation charts: together they form the Arthrex TPLO system framework

What the weight chart is and what it is not

The Arthrex TPLO weight chart is a post-operative rehabilitation tool.

It shows recommended weight-bearing percentages at specific time points after surgery a reference guide that helps veterinarians, rehabilitation therapists, and owners track whether a dog's recovery is progressing appropriately.

It is not the same as the rotation chart (which guides intraoperative tibial rotation) or the plate size chart (which guides implant selection before surgery).

These three charts together form the Arthrex TPLO planning and monitoring system.

For the rotation chart guide, see Arthrex TPLO rotation chart explained. For the plate overview, see Arthrex TPLO plate overview and use.

Understanding the weight-bearing percentages

The chart uses percentage of body weight as its unit of measurement.

This is a more useful measure than time alone because it relates directly to the mechanical load placed on the healing osteotomy and implant.

0 to 10% weight-bearing (weeks 1 to 2): toe-touching and minimal contact only. The dog is not actively loading the leg during this phase. Bathroom trips on leash are permitted, but no sustained weight-bearing.

10 to 30% (weeks 2 to 4): the dog begins placing meaningful weight on the leg during slow leash walks. This corresponds to the short 5 to 10 minute leash walks prescribed at this stage. The healing osteotomy is starting to consolidate but is not yet ready for full load.

30 to 60% (weeks 4 to 8): progressive loading during longer walks, sit-to-stand exercises, and early rehabilitation activities. Most dogs are visibly improving in gait symmetry during this phase.

60 to 100% (weeks 8 to 12): full weight-bearing is approached and typically achieved after the radiographic recheck at week 8 confirms adequate osteotomy healing. Activity levels increase under veterinary guidance.

How to use the chart in practice

As a clinical benchmark

Surgeons use the weight chart to assess whether a dog is progressing as expected at each recheck visit.

A dog that is well below the expected weight-bearing percentage for their stage may have inadequate pain control, implant complications, or infection.

A dog exceeding the expected percentage may be at risk of mechanical overload if the bone has not yet consolidated enough to tolerate the load.

As an owner reference

Owners are not expected to measure exact weight-bearing percentages at home this requires force plate analysis or pressure-sensitive walkway equipment.

The chart provides a conceptual framework: early recovery shows only toe-touching; by weeks 4 to 6, the dog places meaningful weight during walks; by weeks 10 to 12, gait symmetry improves steadily.

What affects weight-bearing progress

Bone healing rate: younger dogs and smaller breeds typically consolidate the osteotomy faster than older or giant breed dogs.

Pain control: inadequate analgesia is the most common cause of delayed weight-bearing. A dog in pain will protect the operated leg regardless of how well the surgery went. Contact your surgeon if your dog is significantly below expected weight-bearing benchmarks.

Muscle atrophy: dogs that enter surgery with significant muscle atrophy from prolonged pre-surgical lameness progress more slowly and benefit most from structured rehabilitation.

Body weight: heavier dogs place more absolute load on the healing osteotomy at any given percentage. This is one reason weight management is emphasized throughout the TPLO recovery period.

Rehabilitation: dogs receiving structured rehabilitation (PROM, sit-to-stand, hydrotherapy) consistently achieve better weight-bearing progression than those managed with rest alone.

When the chart says one thing and your dog does another

The weight chart represents population-level expectations. Individual dogs routinely deviate from the expected timeline for reasons that are often identifiable and manageable.

If your dog is significantly under-progressing: contact your surgeon to rule out infection, implant problems, or inadequate pain management before assuming slow healing.

If your dog appears to be weight-bearing well ahead of schedule: this does not mean the osteotomy is healed faster than expected.

Radiographic confirmation at week 8 is still required regardless of how the dog looks clinically. Apparent early function does not mean the bone has consolidated enough to withstand full unrestricted activity.

For the full weight-bearing recovery timeline guide, see how soon can a dog walk after TPLO surgery.

For the rotation chart that is used alongside the weight chart in the Arthrex system, see Arthrex TPLO rotation chart explained.

For the plate size chart used in conjunction with both, see TPLO plate size chart explained.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arthrex TPLO weight chart the same as a standard recovery timeline?

Not exactly. A recovery timeline tells you what activities to do and avoid at each stage.

The weight chart specifically tracks how much weight the dog is placing on the operated leg at each stage, expressed as a percentage of body weight.

The two are related but provide different information.

Can I measure my dog's weight-bearing at home?

Not precisely. Force plate and pressure-sensitive walkway systems that measure actual weight distribution require specialist veterinary equipment.

At home, you can observe whether the dog is toe-touching, placing the foot flat, and walking with increasing symmetry which approximates the chart's progression categories without exact percentages.

What if my dog refuses to use the leg at all two weeks after TPLO?

Non-weight-bearing at two weeks is a warning sign. TPLO Austin confirms that if your pet is not bearing weight within two weeks of surgery, contact your veterinarian.

The most common causes are inadequate pain control, infection, or implant positioning concerns all of which are addressable if caught early.

Do all TPLO surgeons use the Arthrex weight chart?

No. The Arthrex system is one of the two major TPLO implant systems in the US (alongside Synthes). Surgeons using Synthes implants use Synthes-specific planning tools.

Some surgeons use individualized rehabilitation protocols rather than system-specific charts. The underlying recovery milestones are similar regardless of which chart or system is used.

What happens at the 8-week recheck in terms of weight-bearing?

At the 8-week recheck, radiographs assess osteotomy healing. If healing is adequate, the surgeon approves increased activity typically 20 to 30 minute leash walks and the beginning of return-to-normal activity.

The weight chart at this point expects the dog to be approaching or achieving 100% weight-bearing on the operated leg.

Resources

• Arthrex Veterinary. TPLO Surgical Technique. arthrex.com
• VCA Animal Hospitals. Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy (TPLO) in Dogs. vcahospitals.com
• TPLO Austin. Step 6: TPLO Surgery Recovery. tploaustin.com
• ACVS. Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease. acvs.org